Talk:Maenofferen Shed Heritage Store

Excellent work as usual. But, excuse me, how about moving it to Maenofferen Shed? That title is also open concerning how the shed(s) might be used in the future. --IP (talk) 17:11, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Many thanks for pointing out this apparent discrepancy with two very similar pages on Festipedia.

Yes I agree that the pages Maenofferen Shed and the page I have drafted in connection with the Building Register Maenofferen Shed Heritage Store should be 'merged' and some moving the information be undertaken. I think it should probably that the information on the Maenofferen Shed page should be moved to Maenofferen Shed Heritage Store page.

It's a question as who should do it.

It looks like ACG (Adrian Gray) drafted the page Maenofferen Shed.

I met Adrian Gray at the railway on Saturday and had a brief chat with him. He has been, and still is, very busy in connection with the Annual Kids' week which is currently underway this week on the Ffestiniog Railway.

He is aware of the voluntary work I am undertaking in connection with the Railway's Building Register and Festipedia.

I'm sure when Kids' Week is over he will have more time to put to co-ordinate putting the information on the Maenofferen Shed in the 'Historical Significance' section on Maenofferen Shed Heritage Store page and the Maenofferen Shed page can then be deleted.

I think we will just have to be patient at for the next couple of weeks and leave the two pages as they currently are until Adrian get a chance to do this as he is probably the best person to do this.

I expect there will be other discrepancies like this on Festipedia pages with regard to the Railway's buildings in the future. I am pleased there are other Festipedia users who are looking at the work in connection with the Building Register and will continue to point them out to us.

Thanks again for your comments and suggestion.

Kim Winter (Kfw (talk) 05:48, 3 August 2015 (UTC))

Further to the above, I have now added a link to the Maenofferen Shed page in the 'Historical Significance' section of Maenofferen Shed Heritage Store page.

(Kfw (talk) 06:09, 3 August 2015 (UTC))

Thank you for your appreciation.

But I can't help but think it would be well enough if you moved the material you have given us to ”Maenofferen Shed”. Or else, both articles could be moved to a new page ”Maenofferen Sheds”, if the plural form is considered important.

Either of those titles is shorter than "Maenofferen Shed Heritage Store", and ”Maenofferen Shed(s)” is what the buildings are generally called as far as I know. So I suspect that’s the name people will search for here too, and therefore the best title to make your material easy to find.

Also, that title will not need to be changed the day the use of the sheds changes. —IP (talk) 21:34, 3 August 2015 (UTC)